主题：Analytic Philosophy and Historiography: On the uses and disadvantages of history for philosophy
嘉 宾：Prof. Michael Beaney
Professor of Philosophy at the University of York, England
翻 译：王永忠 东南大学 哲学与科学系 讲师
时 间：2013年3月25日（星期一），18:30--20:30
地 点：东南大学人文学院高级学术活动中心（文科楼A栋五楼A505）
主题摘要：
In this talk, I explore some of the historiographical issues concerning the relationship between philosophy and history of philosophy by focusing on the case of analytic philosophy, which became dominant in Western philosophy in the twentieth century. I offer an account of how analytic philosophy became constructed as a philosophical tradition, and consider some of the histories of analytic philosophy that have been written. I explore the historiographical issues with particular reference to Nietzsche’s distinction between monumental, antiquarian, and critical history, and subsequent debates about the relationship between rational and historical reconstruction. I defend the historical turn that has taken place in analytic philosophy over the last twenty years, explaining why I think history of philosophy is essential to philosophy.
Prof. Michael Beaney简介：
Michael Beaney is the Professor of Philosophy at the University of York, England, and was Visiting Professor at PKU in Autumn Semester 2011. He is the author of Frege: Making Sense (Duckworth, 1996) and Imagination and Creativity (Milton Keynes, 2005), and editor of The Frege Reader (Blackwell, 1997), Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers (with Erich Reck; 4 vols., Routledge, 2005), The Analytic Turn (Routledge, 2007), and The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford, 2013). He is also Editor of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy, and General Editor of a series on the history of analytic philosophy published by Palgrave Macmillan.
主办：东南大学 人文学院 哲学与科学系